A complicated subject - the idea here is to pull the various strands of research together - it can, at this stage only be a series of notes and links.
Literature -
Batty Langley's Early Years in London, 1729-35: Langley Hans Sloane and Artificial Stone.
ChristineMcaleavy Garden History, Vol. 44, No. 2 (WINTER 2016), pp. 191-208 (18 pages).
Available on line via https://www.jstor.org/stable/44987901
The English Ceramic Circle Transactions of 1986, Vol. 12
part 3. This is the most important source for references to the early production of Artificial Stone by Holt, Batty langley and Daniel Pincot
...................
Both Mrs Valpy asnd Alison Kelly appear not to be aware of the Artificial Stone made by Thomas Manning and enlarged upon here.
It may be coincidence but Batty Langley was
In the midst of his prolific book writing, Langley decided that he needed a patron. He recognised that Sir Hans Sloane, the royal physician and collector, was a potential source of support. The first surviving letter from Langley to Sloane was written on 12 May 1727,
Langley's address being given as lodgings with a 'Mr Manning, a Broker at the end of Leather Lane in Holbourn'. In the letter Langley asked for sponsorship of a new gardening book, emphasizing his patriotic credentials which set him apart from other gardening writers.
...................
Thomas Manning and Artificial Stone.
https://bathartandarchitecture.blogspot.com/2025/06/the-lead-original-from-parham-park-in.html
Thomas Manning d. 1747. not to be confused with the several other members of the extensive Manning family of masons and sculptors.
'Thomas Manning' who is described in John Nost I's will of 1710 as 'my manservant,' and was left a suit of apparel (LMA AM/FW 1710/89).
It is likely that he learned his craft as an assistant to van Nost.
His earliest recorded works date from 1720 and were sent, at a cost of £l 17s, by 'Waggon and car' to Gough Park, Enfield - they were Fame, Mercury £12 guineas and Neptune £21 also two boars £8 8s.and two large vases £25 presumably of lead (Davis).
The house at Gough Park was
demolished shortly after 1900 and a planned replacement building never built.
Some of the brickwork from the site was salvaged by E.A. Bowles, the famous
botanist and plantsman, and taken to Myddelton House. These included part of a
pillar and some other unidentified stonework and were placed in the garden. Two
lead ostriches that were originally on the roof of Gough Park overlooking the
garden at the rear of the house were also taken to Myddleton House. Also two
lead boars that were originally displayed on pillars at the entrance to the
house, but they have since been stolen. Some original wrought ironwork forming
part of the boundary wall still remains at Gough Park.
In 1734 Samuel Carter moved into a yard next door rated at £12 annually on Portugal Row, previously occupied by Catherine Nost (check this!). The Carter workshop stood here for over fifty years. His immediate neighbour was Thomas Manning.
This statue of Britannia has disappeared but it is tempting to suggest that the Sotheby's River God illustrated here is also a product of Manning in "artificial Stone".
Manning stood as a character witness in the trial of Mary
Johnson, otherwise Sudley, otherwise Barker, on 5 December 1746, who was
accused of the theft of a gold ring from a William Archer.
Manning died in 1747. An obituary describes him as 'an
ingenious statuary near Hyde Park Corner' - Gentleman's Magazine 1747, 545).
In his will, PROB 11/758/131 proved on 19 November 1747, he
left his stock in trade, utensils, chattels, books, plate and his house on the
corner of White Horse Street to his wife Mary.
He mentions two brothers, Edward and Arnold, to whom he left
the proverbial one shilling and his nephews, Thomas and John Manning (PROB
11/758/6).
The Lead Reclining Statue at Parham Park in Sussex and the Artificial Stone River God originally at Hagley.
It is very obviously related to the lead river god now at Parham. The
figure was brought to Parham by Robert Curzon from Hagley Hall in Staffordshire
in the second half of the nineteenth century.
The life size terracotta /artificial stone river god was sold
by Sotheby's Lot 133. 9 July 1987. Length 180 cms.
It appears to have been fired in two halves.
Prior to the terracotta River God appearing at Sotheby's, I had seen it in a garden of a house which was being developed in Kingsbury St (East side) Marlborough in 1986.
The Manning River God at Stourhead
Henry Hoare Ledger 1734-49, 28 January 1743/44, ‘Thos Manning for a River God &c’ £15-15s. Anonymous 1764 (Stourton Gardens 1749), p. 102 -
Henry Flitcroft to Henry Hoare 7 September 1744, ‘I have inclosd to you the Plan
& Elevation of ye Temple of Ceres with a Sketch of ye Entablature showing
how the Tryglyphs & Metops should be proportioned with the Skuls &c
introduced therein… I have also sent a plan & Section for the Manner of
Laying the Foundations… a Section of ye inside of this Building shall be soon
sent, with particular drawing of ye Doorcase & pedestal Mouldings’.
Payments to William Privett which may relate to the Temple of Flora: HH Ledger
1734-49; 27 September 1745, ‘on accot of ye Temple’ £40; 3 November 1746, ‘in
full of all Demands’ £28-8s-1d; 30 March 1747, ‘on accot of Buildg’ £30. C.
Hoare & Co., HB/5/A/6, Partners’ Ledger 1742-51, HH account, 5 October
1745, ‘His Bill to Willm Privet (Mason)’ £40; 30 December 1745, ‘Willm Privet
of Chillmark’s Bill’ £30.
https://bathartandarchitecture.blogspot.com/2025/06/the-lead-original-from-parham-park-in.html
..................
The Other River God at Stourhead.
Presumably cast in lead but it is concievably the Sotheby's - Marlborough terracotta / artificial stone version.
Thomas Manning (d.1747).
There were two river gods at Stourhead - the one in the grotto which survives by John Cheere and the reclining figure which is missing.
https://drawingmatter.org/the-temple-of-flora-stourhead-a-paradise-revisited/
Henry Flitcroft (1697–1769), elevation, Rocky Arch (the
Cascade below the Temple of Flora), Stourhead, c.1744.
Maybe not the last word on the architecture and sculpture in
the garden at Stourhead but the best work on the subject to date - and highly
recommended!
.........................
The Temple of Flora, Stourhead, Wiltshire, designed by Henry Flitcroft (1697–1769). 1753.
the drawing here attributed to Flitcroft.
Here the pose of the statue is reversed.
The temple presides over springs which provided water to the
village. It was designed by Flitcroft, built by William Privett, 1744–5 and
first dedicated, by Henry Hoare, to Ceres. [1] Flitcroft’s letters indicate the
temple replaced an earlier structure. The Doric portico is limestone from the
Chilmark quarry while the temple itself is greensand stone, rendered at the
sides and exposed at the rear. The tiled roof was renewed in 1842 and the
building restored in 1842 and the building restored in 1894. [2]
The story of the temple is complex to unravel. It housed the
marble statue of Livia Augusta as Ceres, Roman goddess of agriculture or, in
Greek mythology, Demeter, the mother of Persephone and instigator of the
Eleusinian mysteries. After Henry moved her to the Pantheon, c.1760, he
rededicated the temple to Flora, goddess of fertility and flowers. Above the
entrance is inscribed Procul, o procul este profane (Begone, you who are
uninitiated), resonating nicely with the Eleusinian mysteries, but this well-known
quotation from Virgil is first documented at Stourhead in 1787. [3]
Hanway, 1756, described:
the temple of Ceres, which is on the side of the water
nearest to the village… Eight or ten feet below, level with the water, in the
subterraneous grotto, is another figure of the river god.
Pen and colour wash, 178 × 315 mm. DMC 1233.
© The Trustees of the British Museum.






No comments:
Post a Comment