Tuesday, 10 March 2026

Frances Vandewall and her mother Mary Ingram.



Bonham's Old Master Paintings 25 September – 2 October 2024 - Lots 212 and 213.

Portrait of Frances Vandewall, née Ingram, later Mrs George Augustus Killigrew, 

and her mother Mary Ingram nee Bellers.


by William Hoare of Bath (near Eye, Suffolk 1707-1792 Bath).

inscribed 'Mrs Vanderwall' (verso).

pastel.

61 x 45.7cm (24 x 18in).

framed: 83 x 67cm.

Literature.

N. Jeffares, Dictionary of pastellists before 1800, online edition, no. J.395.1342., ill.

 

The sitter, was the daughter of draper Joseph and Mary Ingram of Cheapside, she married Joseph Vandewall (b.1714) in 1737. Joseph died in 1739 at French Ordinary Court in the hospital of Crutched Friars. 

for much more on Samuel Vandewall and the Vandewall family see

https://bathartandarchitecture.blogspot.com/2014/02/samuelvandewall-1719-1761-and-his-wife.html


Frances later married Captain George Augustus Killigrew (1717-1757) in 1753.

Frances Vandewall and Captain George Augustus Killigrew obtained a marriage licence on 27 June 1753 in London.

    

Her will was perhaps proved on 4 April 1765 at the Prerogative Court of Canterbury. She may be the Frances Killigrew, widow of Argyle Buildings, Middlesex, whose will was proved 4 April 1765 but could also be the Frances Maria Killigrew, widow of St Marylebone whose will was proved 2 May 1753.




https://www.bonhams.com/auction/29809/lot/212/william-hoare-of-bath-near-eye-suffolk-1707-1792-bath-portrait-of-frances-vandewall-nee-ingram-later-mrs-george-augustus-killigrew-in-a-blue-dress-and-pearl-necklace-framed-83-x-67cm/






















..................................

Mary Ingram (1689 - 17.

Inscribed 'To Mrs Ingram/ Cheapside/ all paid' (verso).

 William Hoare of Bath (near Eye, Suffolk 1707-1792 Bath).

pastel.

61.1 x 47.8cm (24 1/16 x 18 13/16in).

framed: 82.9 x 66.9cm.


Literature.

N. Jeffares, Dictionary of pastellists before 1800, online edition, no. J.395.1341, ill

Bonham's Old Master Paintings 25 September – 2 October 2024  Lot 213.



Mary Bellers was the daughter of the social reformer John Bellers cloth merchant proponent of the “Colledge of Industry.”and Frances Fettipace of London.

The sitter was married to Joseph Ingram (d.1741), a Cheapside Linen Draper 25 July 1710. son of William Ingram, salter at the Bull and Mouth  Quaker Meeting Gracechurch Street


........................

In his will, dated 8 March 1741, Joseph Ingram left the Hoxton property and any other real estate to his wife Mary (appointed executrix), with an annuity to his sister in law Christabell Ingram (bequeathed originally by his father). 

Bequests to his sons Thomas, Samuel and Robert Ingram and his daughter Frances Vandewall, whose marriage settlement he confirms.'

Date of Death: 21 July 1751 at Coln  St Aldwin, Gloucestershire

 Cause of Death: an inflamation

 Burial: 30 July 1751 at Friends burial ground near Bunhill Fields.


https://wills.qfhs.co.uk/az/wtext/ingram_004.html


.......................................


Highlights of Will of Mary Ingram

 £100 to her daughter Frances Vanderwall.

She confirms the marriage settlement made upon her marriage to Joseph Vanderwall, now deceased.

 She leaves all her estate at Hoxton to her son Thomas Ingram as well as all the property left her by her father John Bellers in Wilts, Oxfordshire and Berkshire, her properties in Pennsylvania and West New Jersey, and her leasehold estates at Coln Saint Aldwin.

 She leaves £4000 to her son Samuel Ingram.

 She leaves a £10 annuity to Susanna, the widow of Benjamin Clerk, and Christobell Lund, the wife of Benjamin Lund, both being the daughters of her late husband’s brother Robert Ingram.

 She also leaves an annuity of £10 to Ann Tarbox, the wife of Joseph Tarbox of Winchmore Hill.

 She leaves the rest of her estate to her sons Thomas and Samuel Ingram, whom she names as her Executors.

 Codicil - She leaves her daughter Frances Vanderwall £800, in addition to the legacy in the will.

Transcript available on line - https://wills.qfhs.co.uk/az/wtext/ingram_005.html



https://www.bonhams.com/auction/29809/lot/213/william-hoare-of-bath-near-eye-suffolk-1707-1792-bath-portrait-of-mary-ingram-nee-bellers-in-a-brown-dress-white-bonnet-and-fichu-framed-829-x-669cm/





















......................................

Will of Mary Ingram, Widow of Joseph Ingram of Cheapside, London

 Will 14 July 1749 with Codicil 18 July 1749   Probate 2 August 1751





................................................

1737. The marriage of Joseph Vandewall (d.1739) who was Samuel Vandewall's older brother (d.1761) to Frances Ingram daughter of Joseph Ingram of Cheapside, Draper, 

Amongst those at the wedding were the apothecary Silvanus Bevan, Joseph Moore, and many of the Ingram family.

 

1739. – 5 Nov. His older brother Joseph (b. 1714) dies of fever at French Ordinary Court. Crutched Friars, He leaves to his dear wife Frances his personal estate and the reversion of an estate at Greenwich “settled on testator” by his father in law Joseph Ingram on his Marriage.

 

1740. Samuel Vandewall inherits Ravensbourne House and the Copperas works at East Greenwich next to the Ravensbourne at Deptford Creek and also property in Peckham, South London from Joseph Moore, his grandfather on his mothers side. The Gentleman’s Magazine in its usual mercenary manner reports the death of Joseph Moore and estate of £30,000, an immense amount of money at the time. See Public Records Office, Kew London, Will of Joseph Moore. Prob 11/705.


........................

The Will of Joseph Vandewall, Merchant of Crutched Friars, City of London.

 The Will 2 November 1739, Probate 6 November 1739.



 https://wills.qfhs.co.uk/az/wtext/vandewall_004.html

Thomas King Marble Mason of Bath Part 2

 

First draft.

Thomas King (1741 - 1804). Marble Mason


The following paragraphs adapted from -

https://www.bathabbeymemorials.org.uk/sculptor/t-king

https://gunnis.henry-moore.org/henrymoore/sculptor/browserecord.php?-action=browse&-recid=1553&from_list=true&x=10

For an useful overview of the Monumental Masons in Bath in the 18th and 19th Centuries by Kim Jordan.

https://historyofbath.org/images/ProceedingsPDFs/PROCEEDINGS%2008%202019-20.pdf



Thomas King (1741-1804), was the founder of one of the most prolific west country firms of monumental masons, he was the son of Henry King, a clockmaker of St Dunstan-in-the-West in the City of London. His son continued the business into the 19th century.

Thomas was apprenticed on 26 March 1752 to Charles Saunders? a London mason, but settled in Bath soon after completing his apprenticeship which would have been for seven years. 

I can find no record of a Charles Saunders - but William Saunders fl.1743 - 54 was a London mason who worked on the reconstruction of Leicester House (Biog Dictionary British Sculptors pub Yale 2009) with an address in Windmill Street.

He married Elizabeth, the daughter of Thomas Paty of Bristol on 6 May 1779 at St Augustine the Less, Bristol. 

The Paty family were architects and masons, responsible for Royal Fort, The Bristol Exchange, Bristol Bridge and many monuments. The Paty family was a prominent multi-generational dynasty of masons, surveyors, and architects based in 18th-century Bristol, originating from Somerset stonemasons and carvers who established workshops in Bristol at the Horsefair and Limekiln Lane.

For an introduction to the Paty family and to be treated with caution (generated by AI) see - https://grokipedia.com/page/william_paty#biography


King maintained cordial relations with the Paty family and was left £250 in his father-in-law’s will. When his brother-in-law, William Paty, died, clients were instructed to forward outstanding debts to King. see - (Felix Farley’s Bristol Journal, 4 April 1801).


King had three children, Thomas and Charles, who entered the business, and Mary, who did not marry during his lifetime.

 

The firm produced a large number of small, wall monuments, often incorporating coloured marbles in an elegant oval, rectangular or inverted shield frame. Most were sold to clients from stock. 

Thomas used the customary range of neoclassical motifs: urns, sarcophagi, willow trees, mourning women, crumpled scrolls held by cherubs and broken columns.

Thomas Gainsborough’s account at Hoare’s Bank records a payment of 18 guineas made to Thomas King in May 1771, perhaps for a picture frame (Gunnis).

 

King also worked on bespoke commissions, such as his first memorial to James Quin with a portrait medallion of the actor of 1769. 

His memorial to Robert Walsh in Bath Abbey has a relief of a broken Ionic column clad with yew on an oval ground of streaked grey marble. It has been suggested that this was the first time the broken column, a traditional symbol of Fortitude, was employed alone on a monument. 

Richard Warner, in his History of Bath, 1801, considered the monument the ‘most remarkable for happiness of design in the whole Abbey’.

His memorials for Venanzio Rauzzini and Sir Nigel Gresley are framed with deep swathes of fabric brought together with three knots.

 

King died a prosperous man and left his widow a number of properties in Bath, including offices, a garden and a yard ‘now in my own occupation’ at Beaufort Place, Walcot. His three children received generous bequests. 

He is buried at Woolley, where a modest tablet, for which he earmarked 20 guineas in his will, bears the epitaph: 

‘Many Years an eminent statuary in the parish of Walcot, who after sustaining a long and painful illness with exemplary fortitude and resignation, calmly departed this life December the 5th, 1804, in his 63rd. year.

The will of ‘Thomas King, Gentleman of Walcot, Somerset’, PROB 11/1427, proved July 1805.


............................



Thomas King, Statuary, nr. Walcot Turnpike. London Road, Bath.

 Thomas King senior served his apprenticeship with the Mason’s Company of London then established his business in Lansdown, Bath in the early 1760’s. 

Later he set up a marble yard and workshops at Snow Hill at the junction with London Road by the Walcot Turnpike. It was sufficiently significant to be recorded on Harcourt Masters’ 1794 map of the city.

 

..................

Some refs to King in the Bath press -

 

Bath Chronicle - 16 February 1786 - Thomas King statuary - marble chimney pieces £6 to £60. Monuments 8 guin to 50 guin.

 Bath Chronicle - 13 April 1786 - Goods: marble chimney pieces, fitted for sale etc at Thomas King's, statuary nr Walcot turnpike.

 Bath Chronicle - 8 Jun 1786 - Goods: For sale marble - chimney pieces. Small monuments for inspection enq T King, statuary nr Walcot turnpike.

 Bath Chronicle -  27 March 1794 - Bath turnpike roads - general meeting of Trustees at the Guildhall on 5 April at 12 noon. To consider removal of present tollbar on London Road at or near Mr King's marble yard in Walcot.


............................


William Reeves foreman to Thomas King.

see my previous post

https://bathartandarchitecture.blogspot.com/2026/03/reeves-of-bath-statuary-and-monumental.html


Bath Chronicle - 18 October 1792  - Wm Reeves, marble mason carver etc, many years foreman to Mr King, has opened a yard in James Street, Kingsmead. Monuments, chimney pieces etc.

Premises at 6 & 7 King Street (presumably old King St) from 1792 to 1826 were used by William Reeves probably as his residence


The Kings and the Reeves were the most successful monumental masons in the late 18th and early to mid 19th centuries with the Biggs and Lancashires offering competition in the heyday of the trade.


The Greenways and Thomas King.


There is an indenture of 20 September 1791, when Thomas King, the statuary of Walcot, with Mr.Charles Harford, gent., as his trustee, conveyed to John Greenway in trust for Francis Greenway, mason, of Walcot (not the transported Australian architect), who would have been only thirteen at the time], ‘part of a pasture of 2a 22p called Upper Tyning [Walcot], being all those plots on the west side of an intended building called Mount Pleasant and all those two messuages thereon erecting at the cost of Francis Greenway.

Sunday, 8 March 2026

Reeves of Bath, Statuary and Monumental Mason.

 



William Reeves .

Bath Chronicle - 18 October 1792  - Wm Reeves, marble mason carver etc, many years foreman to Mr King, has opened a yard in James Street, Kingsmead. Monuments, chimney pieces etc.














Saturday, 7 March 2026

Thomas King, marble Mason of Bath, Part 1. - with a few notes notes on James Quin and his monument with a portrait relief in Bath Abbey and his portraits.


 


The Monument to the actor James Quin (1693 - 1766).

Inscribed by Thomas King.

Quin retired to Bath and spent his last fifteen years lodging in the house of Mrs Simpson at 3, Pierrepont Street. Quin was fond of the city, often referring to it as 'a fine slope to the grave'.

I suspect that the relief was adapted from the mezzotint engraving by Faber after Thomas Hudson.

The monument was put up in 1769.

Bath Abbey.

He retired to Bath and spent his last fifteen years lodging in the house of Mrs Simpson at 3, Pierrepont Street (East side). Quin was fond of the city, often referring to it as 'a fine slope to the grave'.

James Quin was ‘privately interred in the Abbey on 25 January 1766. His monument was erected three years later in 1769 on ‘a pillar at the south-eastern end of the nave”. It was probably moved in the 1860's to its present position.


For a succinct life of Quin see - 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Quin












The epitaph in verse on the monument was written by Garrick. Quin's will displayed a generous nature, and among numerous bequests was one of fifty pounds to "Mr Thomas Gainsborough, limner."





..................................


Garrick, Johnson and Boswell and the Quin monument in Bath Abbey.


https://digitalcollections.folger.edu/img30665

see also


................................


Some portraits by no means exhaustive ---

Quin - Mezzotint 1744.

Faber after Thomas Hudson.

British Museum






The Mezzotint trimmed.

British Museum.










...........................

The Portrait of Quin by William Hogarth.







Said to be Quin by Bartolomeo Nazzari (1699 - 1758).






James Quin by Thomas Gainsborough.

with a bust of Shakespeare

c. 1763.

Handel is supposed to have stayed with Quin in Pierpoint Street in 1749 (Sloman).





of Tangential interest ................



The bust of Shakespeare is not an immediately recognisable version - it resembles loosly the bust in the Royal Collection and it also resembles a version drawn by Samuel Wale at the Folger Shakespeare Library






Marble Bust of Shakespeare.

They say John Cheere but I think this is unlikely - there art no known busts inscribed either by John or his brother Henry Cheere

Royal Collection.






The Royal Collection Gainsborough sketch of Quin.

https://www.rct.uk/collection/search#/11/collection/405949/james-quin-1693-1766

This painting was acquired for only six guineas with other unfinished works from the studio sale in 1797 of Gainsborough's nephew and assistant, Gainsborough Dupont. It is a sketch for a full length portrait (now in the National Gallery of Ireland - above) painted during Quin's retirement in Bath and exhibited at the Society of Artists in 1763. 

Quin was one of the leading actors of the generation before David Garrick, though the two were friendly rivals on the London stage for at least a decade. 

Quin excelled in larger-than-life stage presence and powerful declamation: Garrick was considered the better Richard III, Quin the better Falstaff. Smollett's 'Humphrey Clinker' of 1771 contains an extended literary portrait of Quin during his Bath retirement as a sort of real life Falstaff. Gainsborough's sketch shows similarly the lively bonhomie of a 'big personality'.








.......................................

Portrait of Quin suggested as by Hudson.













.................................


Quin as Falstaff

Mezzotint by James McArdell.

British Museum.





................................

Quin as Falstaff by Boitard.






Quin as Falstaff.

William Duesbery - Derby Porcelaine.

The figure was also produced by the Bow Factory (V&A).

James Quin appeared as Falstaff between 1746-1747.

Image here courtesy Christie's.







..........................


Monument to James and  Anne Sutton. 

After 1788.

Devizes.






......................


There is an indenture of 20 September 1791, when Thomas King, the statuary of Walcot, with Mr.Charles Harford, gent., as his trustee, conveyed to John Greenway in trust for Francis Greenway, mason, of Walcot (not the transported Australian architect), who would have been only thirteen at the time], ‘part of a pasture of 2a 22p called Upper Tyning [Walcot], being all those plots on the west side of an intended building called Mount Pleasant and all those two messuages thereon erecting at the cost of Francis Greenway.





Wednesday, 25 February 2026

An Anonymous 18th Century Plaster bust suggested here as the Pugilist Jack Broughton.


    Mid-18th Century Life Size Plaster bust of a Pugilist?


Perhaps Jack Broughton (1703 – 89) - The Father of English Boxing.

 Proposals for Erecting an Amphitheatre for the Manly Exercise of Boxing, by John Broughton, Professor of Athletics (London, 1743).













 https://bathartandarchitecture.blogspot.com/2021/02/bust-of-moor-by-francis-harwood.html

Monday, 23 February 2026

An Engraving of a Bust of Isaac Newton




From Benjamin Martin's General Magazine of 1755.

Benjamin Martin (1705 - 81).

Truly a Man of the Enlightenment.

Benjamin Martin, was an English science teacher, instrument maker, and popular science author, he died on Feb 9, 1782, at the age of 75-77. 

Son of John Martin he was raised on a farmat Broadstreet, Worplesden, Surrey and apparently had little access to formal schooling, but he read voraciously, and by the time he was in his mid-twenties, he had started a school in Sussex, and he was soon writing textbooks of a sort for use in his and other similar kinds of schools.

In 1729 he married Mary Lover of Chichester, and at the time of his marriage was described as a merchant of Guildford. The couple had two children, a daughter, Maria, and a son, Joshua Lover Martin, who joined his father in the 1770’s to form the firm of B. Martin and Son.

Martin was tradeing at South St., Chichester, Sussex (1736-40).

In 1742, he moved to Reading, on the Thames near London, and there he published two substantial quartos.   Micrographia nova (1742), about two new microscopes he had invented, one a pocket reflecting microscope. 

The other was A Course of Lectures in Natural and Experimental Philosophy (1743).  

He published Benjamin Martin's General Magazine of Arts and Sciences from1755 until 1764.

Benjamin Martin ended up with a large workshop in Fleet Street which produced instruments under his name; made improvements to the microscope and wrote extensively in the field of natural philosophy.

 

Hadley Quadrant & Visual Glasses, Two doors from Crane Court, Fleet St. (1756-9), resident in Fleet St. (1756-82), 

He was Four doors East of Crane Court (1760), 

The New Invented Visual Glasses, Fleet St. (1761) & 171 Fleet St. (1767-77), London.


A very close neighbour to Martin in Fleet Street was Benjamin Rackstrow on the Corner of Crane Court on the North side of Fleet St. see -

https://bathartandarchitecture.blogspot.com/2026/02/john-cheere-hoskins-hoskings-and-oliver.html

and very close to the building of the Royal Society in Crane Court.


The Young Gentleman and Lady’s Philosophy (second edition, London: 1772). 

The essay is written in the form of  conversations between Cleonicus, home from College for the summer, and his sister, Euphrosyne, whose lively interest in the natural sciences (“philosophy”) is impeded by her lack of access to instruction on the topic. 

She has formed the plan of getting her brother to help her, and in a series of dialogues, Cleonicus introduces her to astronomy and physics, using sketches, models, and experiments. Although she frequently suggests that a new subject may be too difficult for her, her intelligence and his organized and factual instruction consistently produce firmly rooted understanding on which she builds. 

This work is a rare publication in England in the 18th Century that speaks out for women’s education, arguing that if they were given the opportunity to study the sciences, they could excel.


https://specialcollections.blogs.brynmawr.edu/2017/08/21/eclipses-from-the-ellery-yale-wood-collection-of-childrens-books-and-young-adult-literature/


                                                        Cleonicus and Euphrosyne.

With the bust of Newton over the door.

                                     The drawing by Sam.Wale and engraved by Grignion.

















He was very successful in his day but since his teaching drove his book sales, that source of income ran low.

By the early 1780s, he was bankrupt.  In 1782, he was dead, possibly the result of a botched suicide. 

He left no money, but he had an extensive collection of instruments, which generated a thousand pounds at the bankruptcy auction.





Friday, 20 February 2026

John Cheere apprentices - James Hoskins (Hoskings) and Samuel Euclid Oliver, and Benjamin Grant - Some notes -

 


This post came about with researches into the business relationship of Benjamin Rackstrow and his later partner the midwife Catherine Clarke at Fleet Street.

Rackstrow left his entire estate to the enterprising Catherine Clarke

Catherine Clarke's premises were next door at 195 Fleet St.

Googling came up with this rather unedifying publication.

It is difficult to see who this publication was aimed at  - it is salacious and rather repetive but had it not been published the relationships of the Hoskins family Samual Euclid Oliver, Catherine Clarke and Benjamin Rackstrow might not have been exposed.

.....................

Samuel Euclid Oliver in Trouble.

Samuel Euclid Oliver was the son of Richard Oliver, Mathematician of Greenwich, Kent and was apprenticed to Benjamin Rackstow from 25 March 1760 for 7 years.

The two stone globes, six feet in diameter and weighing seven tons each, were designed by Richard Oliver, formerly mathematics master at Weston's Academy at Greenwich, who was paid 50 guineas for this in 1754.

Oliver was married in the Church at Greenwich.



Trials for Adultery ..... pub. 1779.

It is difficult to see who this publication was aimed at  - it is salacious and rather repetive but had it not been published the relationships of the Hoskins family Samual Euclid Oliver, Catherine Clarke and Benjamin Rackstrow might never have been exposed.



https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Trials_for_Adultery_Or_The_History_of_Di/xpk-AQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22catherine+clarke%22+midwife+fleet+street&pg=PA4&printsec=frontcover


So far this is the only depiction that I can discover of an English 18th Century Plaster Caster. I suspect that it is not a very good likeness!

Drawn by Daniel Dodd (d.1780). and engraved by Wale.

Not to be confused with William Dodd the "Macaroni Parson" who was convicted of forgery on 22 February 1777 and hanged on 27 June.



Oliver was married to Sarah Hoskins, who Catherine Clarke had known for around three years - she had known Oliver she said, for around ten years, he having been an apprentice (probably aged about 14) to an acquaintance of hers named Mr Rackstrow. Catherine had often visited the Olivers’ home, and believed the couple acted ‘lovingly’ when she was there.

The couple were married on 29 December 1768 in East Greenwich and court records state they had three children: Charles James, Elizabeth and James - all three had died by the time of the trial.

The births of the three children may have been what Catherine referred to when she stated that she had seen Sarah and Samuel together at their home and it is possible that Mrs Clarke was present on at least one of the births.

In the summer of 1773 Oliver visited Catherine Clarkes Fleet Street premises and asked her for some pills for ‘a young woman in the country, who was not regular’. Clarke asked if she was ‘slender or robust and if with child.’ Oliver replied that he did not know if she was pregnant, but if she was, she was in the early stages of pregnancy. Accepting  the pills, he asked if there was a chance that the pills might end a pregnancy. Clarke replied that no, she had nothing - and knew of nothing - that would.

 

The pills were for Elizabeth Hoskings, Sarah’s younger sister. Samuel had been having a secret affair with his sister-in-law, after visiting Sarah’s parents’ home in the winter of 1772.

 A fourteen-year-old apprentice in the Hoskings’ household, Elizabeth Tinman, testified she had often seen Samuel kiss Elizabeth and take ‘other indecent liberties with her’ showing that they did not hide their affair in front of servants.

In early 1773 she went to Elizabeth’s bedroom to put on her cap and saw the couple in a compromising position half-undressed on a bench. On seeing the wide-eyed young apprentice at the door, Samuel was said to have ‘ran into a corner and held up his breeches’, while Elizabeth appeared in ‘a great fright’.

 

Olivers sister-in-law also gave testimony to the court. Their relationship, she said, had lasted more than two years. In August of 1773 she approached him suspecting she was pregnant, feeling sick and generally ill. Oliver told her that the affair ‘must not come to light’ and gave Clarkes pills, along with a letter with instructions on how to take them, which he told her to burn after reading.

At first, she refused to take the pills but after more anxious threats and another letter in which Oliverwrote ‘in the midst of my trouble don’t you afflict me’, she swallowed them.

As Clarke predicted, they did not affect the pregnancy.

Elizabeth then revealed everything to her mother Elizabeth, who told Sarah and Elizabeth’s father, James.


His wife left the home she shared with Oliver and moved into her parents’ house, and issued proceedings to end the marriage. 

On hearing that he was to be divorced, Samuel turned up at the house and reportedly struck his father-in-law during an argument. 

Despite being led away by the Constable he returned again the following evening, threatening to murder the entire Hoskings family. 

He was detained, and the judges ruled that Sarah and Samuel were to be divorced.



.................................


James Hoskins (d.1791) was apprenticed to the sculptor John Cheere (1709-87) in 1747. 


By 1770 Hoskins whose premises were in the Churchyard of St Martin's in the Fields had set up in business with Samuel Euclid Oliver, a neighbour on St Martin’s Lane. 

Their stock-in-trade was plaster casts, many of which were copies or casts of antique originals. 

In 1773 they were rated on property at £20 and £22 respectively. 

That year Hoskins took a lease from the church authorities on a larger property ‘standing and being on the west side of St Martin’s Lane, aforesaid being the corner house of a passage leading to the new churchyard’ (Westminster Archive Poor Rates, quoted in Sullivan 2020 (1), n.17). His new rate was £35 We lose sight of Oliver after his divorce!

 Sometime after 1773 Hoskins entered into a partnership with Benjamin Grant another of  John Cheere's apprentices in St Martin’s Lane. 

In his capacity as ‘moulder and caster in plaster’ to the Royal Academy, Hoskins supplied plaster casts throughout the 1770s and 1780s. 

He also supplied Wedgwood with reliefs, busts and moulds, many of which were reproduced in black ‘basalt’ stoneware. 

Among Hoskins’s clients was Sir Joshua Reynolds, who commissioned a ‘plaister bust of Dr Johnson moulded after his death’, an object that still survives today.

Roques Map showing the entrance to the Churchyard from St Martin's Lane.




....................


James Hoskins, Samuel Euclid Oliver and Benjamin Grant.

 

Hoskins was apprenticed to John Cheere in 1747. He seems to have progressed in his employment quickly a note in the London Evening Post of December 1751 concerning the successful treatment of William Collins’s leg ulcer with ‘Iron Pear Tree Water’ described Hoskins, a witness to the recovery, as ‘Foreman to Mr Cheere’ (Friedman and Clifford 1974, appendix C).

Presumably the sculptor William Collins - William Collins (1721-93) was an apprenticel of the sculptor Henry Cheere (1702-1781). He specialised in religious and mythological scenes. He was among the group that founded the Society of Artists in 1759, and used their exhibitions to showcase his bas-reliefs. After leaving Cheere’s workshop in c.1760, Collins pursued an independent practice as a sculptor.

 

By 1770 Hoskins had set up in business with Samuel Euclid Oliver, and together they supplied works for Mersham Hatch  and a good many reliefs, busts and other works for Wedgwood Hoskins also held the post of ‘moulder and caster in plaster’ to the Royal Academy from its foundation.

 

Wedgwood had moulds made directly from the Lansdown bas-reliefs by Hoskins and Oliver in 1770.  In 1771 they were in production in black basalt and at Bentley’s suggestion later that year other colours were made of which ones like ours in ‘black with the encaustic red ground’ were the most sought after.


Wedgwood’s fourteen Herculaneum Pictures were moulded from a group of plaster bas-reliefs brought to England by William Petty, 1st Marquess of Lansdowne (1737-1805), thirteen of which were inspired by frescoes from Pompeii and Herculaneum. The frescoes that provide the source for the subjects of Polyphemus and Cupid and Marsyas and the young Olympus, depicted on the present pair of plaques, are now preserved in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale in Naples . 

Lord Lansdowne, an enthusiastic and esteemed patron of Wedgwood, allowed moulds to be made of his bas-reliefs for reproduction at the Wedgwood Etruria factory. 

Hoskins and Oliver, supplied Wedgwood with a Bacchus in 1770, but it is not clear whether it was for this figure or the Bacchus after Michelangelo. Both were listed in the Wedgwood & Bentley Catalogue published in 1773.


In July 1773 Hoskins provided two casts of lions for the Royal Academy. A group of academicians, including Agostino Carlini, George Moser and Benjamin West went to Slaughters coffee-house in St Martins Laneto inspect the casts, which they found acceptable.


It appears that the moulds were executed by Hoskins & Oliver in 1770 ; certainly they were in production in black basalt by the following year as Josiah wrote to Bentley early in 1771 that ‘he was finishing some frames for the Herculaneum, & other Bas reliefs’. The series are subsequently listed in the Wedgwood & Bentley Catalogues of 1773-79 and 1787, nos. 51-65, described as ‘Figures from paintings in the ruins of Herculaneum; the models brought over by the marquis of Lansdown’, with Polyphemus and Cupid on a dolphin recorded in the Catalogue as no. 60 and Marsyas and Young Olympus as no. 61.

Hoskins and Oliver modelled a bust of Prior for Wedgwood c.1773 (R. Reilly, Wedgwood, 1989, I, p 458, pl.655

An invoice in the Wedgwood archives exists for a large number of moulds, dated 16 January 1773, which came to 11s 6d. 

An invoice in the Wedgwood archives for a large number of moulds, dated 16 January 1773, came to 11s 6d. Another invoice of March 21, 1774, from Hoskins and Grant, was for ‘plaister casts prepaird to mould’ which included busts of Zeno, Pindar, Faustina, Inigo Jones and Palladio, at what appears to be a standard price of a guinea a bust, and moulds of antique stone. The whole bill came to £29 13s 2d.


By 1774 Hoskins had entered into partnership with Benjamin Grant, another of John Cheere’s former apprentices. Together they supplied Wedgwood with more items. 

Another invoice of  March 21, 1774, from Hoskins and Grant, was for ‘plaister casts prepaird to mould’ which included busts of Zeno, Pindar, Faustina, Inigo Jones and Palladio, at what appears to be a standard price of a guinea a bust, and moulds of antique stone. The whole bill came to £29 13s 2d.

 

Another Hoskins and Grant invoice of January 1775 notes the supply of many more busts, including a Galen and Hippocrates, and British worthies such as Ben Jonson, ‘Sir W Reigle’, Fletcher and Beaumont, Harvey and Newton. This bill came to £23 17s 4d, and was signed ‘for self and partner Benj Grant’.

 

In 1779 they were paid £26 6s 6d for items including figures of Zingara and Chrispagnia at £2 2s (Meteyard 1866, 1, 324-5). Hoskins was still active in 1790, when he provided small works for Lord Delaval (12).

 

Literary References: Meteyard 1866, 1, 324-5; Gunnis 1968, 211; Pyke 1973, 70; Friedman and Clifford 1974, appendix H; Clifford 1992, 58

Archival References: RA Council Minutes, 1, ff160-1 June 1773; Wedgwood/Hoskins





 By 1774 Hoskins had entered into partnership with Benjamin Grant, another of John Cheere’s apprentices. 


 

Another Hoskins and Grant invoice of January 1775 notes the supply of many more busts, including a Galen and Hippocrates, and British worthies such as Ben Jonson, ‘Sir W Reigle’, Fletcher and Beaumont, Harvey and Newton. This bill came to £23 17s 4d, and was signed ‘for self and partner Benj Grant’.

 

In 1779 they were paid £26 6s 6d for items including figures of Zingara and Chrispagnia at £2 2s (Meteyard 1866, 1, 324-5). Hoskins was still active in 1790, when he provided small works for Lord Delaval (12).

 

Literary References: Meteyard 1866, 1, 324-5; Gunnis 1968, 211; Pyke 1973, 70; Friedman and Clifford 1974, appendix H; Clifford 1992, 58

Archival References: RA Council Minutes, 1, ff160-1 June 1773; Wedgwood/Hoskins

 

see - http://liberty.henry-moore.org/henrymoore/sculptor/browserecord.php?-action=browse&-recid=1388&from_list=true&x=11



View of St Martin in the Fields Church Yard - 1828 - by George Scharf .

The premises of Hoskins were in the Churchyard before moving over the road to the West side of  St Martin's Lane.

British Museum.

https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/P_1862-0614-108




...................................

 Robert Adam and James Hoskins. Some notes -

Adam commissions: In the early 1770s, Adam commissioned Hoskins to produce two plaster figures – Apollo and Mercury – for Sir Edward Knatchbull at Mersham-le-Hatch in Kent. 

He paid £24 6s for the pair, but took some persuading from Adam. Knatchbull expressed concern that the nude Apollo figure might lack decorum: ‘I must send for a taylor to cloath him for as we sometimes have chaste and delicate eyes … nakedness might possibly give offence’.


                                     Kenwood House and Messrs Hoskins and Oliver.


 The antechamber outside the library at Kenwood originally contained three plaster sculptures in the three niches. The sculptures were made for Lord Mansfield by James Hoskins (d. 1791) and Samuel Oliver (fl. 1769-74).

They had set up business together running a plaster shop between c.1770, until 1774. 

Hoskin had been apprenticed to John Cheere (1709-87) in 1747 and held the post of 'moulder and caster in plaster' to the Royal Academy.18 

Their original invoice of 25 November 1771 states -

To three Large Antyke Figures Vizt Flora Teis [Thetis] and a Muse  -£50. 8. 0.

To selves and Assistants going with them to Kenwood £1. 1. 0.

Total £51. 9. 0.


..........................


William Wynn.

                                                           

The trade card in Banks Collection (Banks,106.33) which advertises "William Wynn Statuary... Late Apprentice to Mr. Rackstrow. Takes off Gentlemen & Ladies Faces from the Life, with the greatest ease & safety & forms them into Busts, to an exact Likeness. Likewise makes all sorts of Figures, Busts, Vases, &c. for Halls, Stair Cases, Dining Rooms, &c. in Plaister [sic] of Paris, to represent either Marble, Stone, or Bronzes &c. Likewise Mends, Gilds, Paints & Bronzes Old figures &c. N.B. Leaden figures, Vases &c. for Gardens made & mended."

https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/P_Banks-106-33


................................


Benjamin Rackstrow, ‘The Crown and Looking-Glass’, the lower end of the paved stones, St Martin’s Lane, London ?1720s-1737?, ‘Sir Isaac Newton’s Head’, the corner of Crane Court in Fleet St 1738-1748 or later, 197 Fleet St by 1768-1772. Cabinet maker, sculptor, picture framemaker, figure caster etc.

 

Benjamin Rackstrow (d.1772) led a varied career, from picture frame making to sculpture and to opening a museum of waxwork figures. He is presumably the Benjamin Rackstrow who married Hannah Bonruc or Bourne at St Luke Old Street, in 1733, and who had a son William by Sarah (his second wife?) in 1737, baptised at St Dunstan-in-the-West, Fleet St, and three further children between 1740 and 1744. 

He was made free of the Joiners’ Company in July 1737 (information from Robert B. Barker, quoting Guildhall Library MS 8051/4, f.56 verso), probably to meet requirements for working within the bounds of the City at his new premises in (159) Fleet St.

 

Rackstrow issued his first trade card, perhaps in the 1720s, from St Martin’s Lane, advertising ‘all sorts of Cabinet Work, Looking-Glasses, Coach-glasses, Window Blinds, Picture-frames &c. after the newest fashion and at the most Reasonable Rates. He likewise cleans and repairs all sorts of Cabinet work, Exchanges New Glasses for Old ones and makes Old ones fashionable, NB. He also cleans Pictures in the best manner and takes off Busto’s, Basso Reliev’s, and Figures of any Size in Wax, Metal, or Plaister of Paris’ (repr. Heal 1972 p.153). 

He issued a further impressive trade card, dated 1738 and engraved by Henry Copland, from the corner of Crane Court in Fleet St, calling himself a cabinet and picture framemaker, and advertising a very similar range of services to before, also offering to hang bells after the new manner (repr. Heal 1972 p.154). In a publication of 1748 he described himself as a ‘figure maker and statuary’ (Miscellaneous observations, together with a collection of experiments on electricity).

 

As a picture framemaker, we know very little of his activity. As a sculptor we know a little more, including the supply of a figure of the piping Faunus to Lady Luxborough in 1742, ‘three bustos and a group’ in 1748 for Arbury in Warwickshire, a statue of George II for Weaver’s Hall, Dublin, in 1749-

more likely to have been  by John van Nost III , and two busts in 1752 and a figure of Edward VI to the Ironmongers’ Company (Gunnis 1968 p.314; Roscoe 2009). 

From a court case in 1759, we learn that Rackstrow stocked a little figure of Shakespeare, about 12 ins high, which he sold for about 12s (Proceedings of the Old Bailey).

He exhibited a coloured plaster figure and busts at the Free Society of Artists in 1763. 

His former apprentice, William Wynn, statuary, advertised from Shakespeare’s Head, Henrietta St, Covent Garden, in 1758 (Public Advertiser 31 May 1758; see also trade card, Banks coll., 106.33).

 

In later life, Rackstrow was known for his museum of waxwork figures and other curiosities which he maintained on his premises in Fleet St; these exhibits included life-size anatomical models (see Richard Altick, The Shows of London, 1978, pp.55-6; see also Matthew Craske, ‘ “Unwholesome” and “pornographic”: a reassessment of the place of Rackstrow’s Museum in the story of 18th-century anatomical collection and exhibition’, Journal of the History of Collections, vol.23, 2011, pp.75-99).

 

In his will, made 14 October 1769 and proved 1 June 1772, Benjamin Rackstrow, of St Dunstan-in-the-West, Temple Bar, left much of his estate to Catherine Clarke, including his busts, skeletons and moulds. His moulds, casts, figures and busts, from the antique, were sold shortly thereafterwards (Daily Advertiser 25 September 1772).

 

Sources: Information kindly provided by Robert B. Barker, 2011, on Rackstrow’s freedom and posthumous sale, and on William Wynn’s advertisement.

The British Museum Trade Cards etc of Benjamin Rackstrow.


"Benj: Rackstrow...Makes and Sells all sorts of Cabinet Work, Looking-Glasses, Coach-Glasses, Window-Blinds, Picture-frames &c. after the newest fashion and at the most Reasonable Rates. He likewise cleans and repairs all sorts of Cabinet work, Exchanges New Glasses for Old ones and makes Old ones fashionable. NB. He also cleans Pictures in the best manner and takes off Busto's, Basso Releiv's [sic], and Figures of any Size, in Wax, Metal, or Plaister [sic] of Paris." Heal's annotations on mount: "? c.1730. 




Compare photograph of another trade-card in Mr. Cattle's collection with engraved date 1738 : - 'Benjamin Rackstrow, cabinet & picture frame maker at Sir Isaac Newton's Head, the corner of Crane Court, in Fleet St.' " Heal,28.187 and Heal,96.16 advertise "Benjamin Rackstrow Cabinet & Picture-frame-Maker...Makes all sorts of Cabinet Work, Picture Frames, Looking & Coach Glasses, Window Blinds &c. after ye newest fashions & at ye most Reasonable Rates. Exchanges New Glasses for Old. Makes old ones fashionable & Repairs all sorts of Cabinet Work. Cleans and new lines Pictures, takes off Busto's, Basso Relieves and Figures of any Size in Wax, Metal or Plaster of Paris, And hangs Bells after the new manner." 




Heal's annotations on mount of 28.187: "Original in F. Cattle's collection. B. Rackstrow, statuary, at Sir Isaac Newton's Head in Fleet Street advertised 'That he has found out and completed an Apparatus to exhibit that Grand Experiment, The Chair of Beautification...' 'Daily Advertiser' 5. May. 1747. See photograph of another trade-card : - 'Benj: Rackstrow, cabinet maker etc. at the Crown & Looking Glass the lower end of the Paved Stones in St. Martin's Lane ?c.1720." Heal's annotations on mount of 96.16: "Engraved by H.Copland. 1738."

 On 14 April 1739 he submitted a bill to Sir R. Hoare for a ‘mahogany top to table’, costing £1 5s, for Barn Elms House.

Rackstrow announced in Daily Advertiser, 5 May 1747 that he had ‘found out and completed an Apparatus to exhibit that Grand Experiment the Chair of Beatification…’.




The London Magazine reported the death of Benjamin Rackstrow on 29 May 1772.

........................


Rackstrows Publications.

Miscellaneous observations, together with a collection of experiments on electricity. With the manner of performing them. Designed to explain the nature and cause of the most remarkable phenomena thereof. With some remarks on a pamphlet, intituled, A sequel to the experiments and observations tending to illustrate the nature and properties of electricity / [by Sir W. Watson] To which is annexed, a letter, written by the Author to the Academy of Sciences at Bordeaux, relative to the similarity of electricity to lightening and thunder.

https://wellcomecollection.org/works/t7ab3fka/items


...................................

A Descriptive Catalogue ... of Rackstrow's Museum: consisting of a large, and very valuable collection, of most curious anatomical figures, and real preparations ... with a great variety of natural and artificial curiosities. To be seen at no. 197 Fleet-Street ... London / Benjamin Rackstrow. Pub 1782.

No author is given but almost certainly the enterprising midwife Mrs Clarke who had inherited Rackstrows estate.

Further revised editions were published in 1787 and 1794. Both available 



https://wellcomecollection.org/works/hjm6q586/items?canvas=5






Page 30 and 31.









....................

Ref Crane Court Fleet St. and the Royal Society.

Sir Isaac Newton suggested the move of the Royal Society, and he pushed his plans through, despite significant opposition, and in 1710, they bought  (Nicholas Barbon?) built-house at the northern end of Crane Court for their new home. This building was refurbished and an extension added to the instructions of Christopher Wren?

In 1778, botanist Sir Joseph Banks became President of the Royal Society, a position he was to hold for nearly 42 years. One of his first acts as President was to accept an offer from the Government of rooms in the newly rebuilt Somerset House, setting in motion the Society’s removal from Crane Court. 

The final meeting of the Royal Society at Crane Court took place there on 23 November 1780, after which the property was sold to the Scottish Corporation.