Friday, 28 February 2025

John Cheere Cast Lead Dog

 

A Lead Sculpture of a Dog.

John Cheere.

Circa.1760.

Height 24" (61cm).

Provenance :- Sir Francis Dashwood, 2nd Bt. (1708-1781), West Wycombe Park, Buckinghamshire; by descent at West Wycombe to Sir Francis Dashwood, 11th Bt., until 1987; Sold Sotheby’s London;

 The Hon. Simon Sainsbury.

Cheere is known to have worked for Sir Francis Dashwood at West Wycombe at various times between 1751 and 1778 (payments of over £200 are recorded, which suggests a considerable amount of work when compared to the £800 Cheere received for his largest known commission, of no less than 98 lead sculptures for the Palace of Queluz in Portugal). 



 This  lead sculpture appears in two inventories from West Wycombe Park, firstly in 1782 (The Inventory of Sir Francis Dashwood’s Effects at West Wycombe Park, Room 16, Gallery ‘a lead figure of a dog’), and again in the house’s Heirloom Inventory, 1862, ‘A marble cast of a bull mastiff sejant (lead cast)’.

Sotheby’s London, European Works of Art, Sculpture, Metalwork and Pewter, 7th April  1987, lot 174 


http://www.harrislindsay.com/media/files/hl_09.pdf





Image below from the Conway Library.





Thursday, 27 February 2025

Part 1 - Samson Slaying the Philistine aka Cain and Abel.

 

 The Lead Statues of  Samson and the Philistine Part 1.

The Lead Groups.

Some notes and images.

This post includes particular reference to Richard Osgood (d.1724) of Stone Bridge, Hyde Park Corner and the first recorded lead Samson now at Chatsworth.

..................

 This post will be part of a series discussing the various lead statues and Groups made by John Cheere with particular reference to those in the gardens of Queluz Palace in Portugal. It will also put together notes on the Statuary Industry at Hyde Park Corner at the Western end of what is now Piccadilly.


The various versions of this group of Samson slaying the Philistine (frequently referred to as Cain and Abel in the 18th Century were based on the original Renaissance marble group by Giambologna which is now in the Victoria and Albert Museum which in turn was inspired by an original by Michelangelo.

The original by Michelangelo lacked the cloak and included a separate downtrodden figure (see the bronze statuette in The Met Museum New York).




The first recorded lead replica of the group it appears was supplied to Chatsworth in 1691, possibly by Richard Osgood (fl. 1691 d,1724) of Hyde Park Corner who is known to have produced a copy for Sutton Court (Chiswick House). in 1695 as well as other lead ornaments for Chatsworth. 

John Nost I (the Elder) who seems to have collaborated with Richard Osgood on several projects also supplied leadwork to Chatsworth and must have known the original marble sculpture because of his commissions for Buckingham House (c. 1703). 

Van Nost the Elder  moved to England the later 17th century, gaining employment with the sculptor Arnold Quellin as a foreman. After Quellin's death in 1686, Nost married his widow, and established his own sculptural works business in the Haymarket district of London.


An early 18th century cast of the Samson group attributed to John van Nost I is at Harrowden Hall (reproduced Country Life 1908, Jackson Stops 1974) and a ‘Cain and Abel, of John de Bellone, lead’ was one of the sculptures sold at Nost’s end-of-life sale in 1712 (O'Connell 1987). 


For the Elder van Nost's Samson see my post -

 https://bathartandarchitecture.blogspot.com/2025/03/samson-slaying-philistine-aka-cain-and.html

After his death John van Nost's moulds were reused by his cousin John Nost II (d.1729) and later (probably in collaboration) by the firm’s apprentice/assistant, Andrew Carpenter (Carpentiere) (c. 1677-1737), as a Cain and Abel was sent by Nost II to Hopetoun House in 1718, whilst the Chiswick House cast of c. 1725 (which is now at Chatsworth) and the Stowe cast (installed by 1738; sold in 1922, now at Trent Park) are attributed to Carpenter (Bevington 1994, p. 114).


Certainly Carpenter produced copies of Giambologna’s group because a Cain and Abel is  recorded on the price list sent to Charles Howard, 3rd Earl of Carlisle (1669-1738), in 1723 (see - A Biographical Dictionary of Sculptors in Britain, 1660-1851, Yale pub. 2009 ‘Andrew Carpenter’). 


The sculpture appears again in the repertoire of John Cheere, Carpenter’s successor, who supplied a Cain and Abel made from Nost or Carpenter moulds to Portugal in 1755-6 as part of a massive commission for Queluz Palace (Neto and Grillo 2006, pp. 5-18). 



Henry Cheere (1703 – 81) and his younger brother John Cheere (1709 – 87) took over the yard of Anthony ‘Noast’ Nost at Hyde Park Corner in 1737 in what became Portugal Row, Piccadilly,  Henry Cheere’s workshops were in Westminster and quite separate from the Hyde Park Corner site which appears to have been occupied solely by John Cheere and his workshop.

Other sculptors in this growing centre for the trade included Thomas Carter I, William Collins, Richard Dickinson and Thomas Manning. 

Andrew Carpenter had ceased producing lead figures in the previous year and it seems likely that Cheere acquired some of his early stock and moulds from Carpenter’s sale, for, like Carpenter, he later marketed figures of a Blackamoor with a Sundial, the Borghese Gladiator and Diana with her Stag. 

After Manning’s death in 1747 John Cheere took over two of his yards.


Several casts of Cheere's Samson and the Philistine still exists, along with other lead figures at Seaton Delaval (NT 1276673), Wimpole (NT 207395), Drayton House (reproduced Tipping 1912), Southill Park (bought by Samuel Whitbread at Cheere’s estate sale, 1812; reproduced Hussey 1930) and the Yale Center for British Art (inv.no. B2012.3; previously with Tomasso Brothers).


..........................

The Chatsworth Samson and the Philistine.

It has been stated that the first recorded lead replica of the group described as Cain and Abel was supplied to Chatsworth in 1691, possibly by Richard Osgood of Hyde Park Corner (fl. 1691 d,1724) who is known to have produced a version, along with statues of Mars and Minerva - I suspect that this isn't true.  


Is it a coincidence that Richard Osgood supplied Thomas Belasyse, Lord Fauconberg at Sutton Court, Chiswick (later Chiswick House) with a Cain and Abel for which he was paid £42 in 1695? - this version has supposedly disappeared.


Richard Osgood went, after Fauconberg’s death, to repair and paint them) for his house Sutton Court (later known as Chiswick House, which was acquired by Lord Burlington in 1726). 

Amongst the Fauconberg papers is Arthur Palmer’s Account Book. Palmer was Fauconberg’s steward and kept an account of all expenditure on his Chiswick property – he spent £42 on statuary.


There is the version of Samson and the Philistine in a painting at Chatworth of the garden at Chiswick House by Pieter Rysbrack of 1728.

John Nost the Elder (d.1710) also supplied leadwork to Chatsworth and must have known the original marble sculpture because of his commissions for Buckingham House (c. 1703). 

According to the recent book by David Jacques: Chiswick House Gardens, 300 years of creation and re-creation, published in 2022, the following statues are at Chatsworth, were removed from Chiswick in the pre-lease period by the 8th Duke of Devonshire (d. 1908). Cain and Abel, aVenus de Medici (from the Rosary) 12 terms (5 x Guelfi, 1729, 7 bibbed?) and 12 stone stools ‘The boar and the wolf’ a goat and several cement vases



The Chatsworth Samson Slaying the Philistine by Richard Osgood.

circa 1695.

Formerly at Chiswick removed in and now at Chatsworth.





















.........................

Chiswick House.

Pieter Rysbrack.

1727.


.....................

The Engraving pub. Carrington Bowles after Rysbrack.










........................


Richard Osgood of Hyde Park Corner. Some notes.

Info here predominantly from Biographical dictionary.. Pub Yale 2009 and website.

The first record of Osgood’s work dates from 1691, when he supplied two heads for Kensington Palace (15). His name subsequently appears in the accounts of several country estates and royal palaces as the provider of a considerable amount of lead and other metal work.

He must have made a good living prior to 1691 for on 1 January 1689, in partnership with Huntley Bigg, a scrivener, (Bigg was involved with water supply from the Thames) he bought 30 acres of land in Alkham, Kent from Mathias Shore of St Martin-in-the-Fields.


In 1694 Osgood sent off statues for Sir Roger Hill at Denham Place, Bucks (2, 25). These do not appear to have survived but a topographical sketch of Denham shows several statues in situ, which may well be his work (repr Harris 1957-8, 192). Statue of Neptune and a statue of Hercules.

 

In 1700 Osgood was employed in mending statues at Hampton Court and his bill gives an insight into the practice of restoration at that time. He was paid £43 ‘for casting of new feet and part of ye legs of copper to the great Hercules’ and another £40 ‘for casting a large piece of drapery of the great statue of Antineous and making good what was wanting of ye legs...’ He also provided ‘two new arms of copper and the great part of the drapery and a new quiver of arrows for the Diana that stands in the Quadrangle Court and burning altogether and mending several other parts. For rifling and cleaning the figure with aquafort to make it look bright all alike’ (TNA WORK 5/51 fol 506).

 In 1709 he was responsible for further repairs at Hampton Court, supplying ‘two new wings for the statue of Victory and two new trumpets for the statue of Fame’.

In 1715 he was ordered ‘to model and cast in hard metal two large sea-horses and two large Tritons to spout the water in the great bason’ in Bushey Park (Gunnis 1968, 285, incorrectly cites PRO AO1.2447).

Osgood’s premises were at Hyde Park Corner, close to the lead manufacturers John Nost I, Edward Hurst and Josias Iback.

He collaborated with Nost at least once. The statues sent to Knole in 1697 were billed by Osgood but possibly supplied by Nost (6-8, 18) and in 1701 he certainly collaborated with Nost on a large order for twenty-four lead urns for Hampton Court (20) and he appears to have worked in partnership with another neighbour, the ironsmith Jean Tijou, at Sutton Court (13).

 

He was rated on three houses in Portugal Row (now Picadilly) in 1697, two at £12 and one at £30. His premises were visited in 1703 by the architect William Winde, who was attempting to find a statue for the garden of Lady Mary Bridgwater. Winde reported that he had been to ‘Mr Nostes’ and ‘Mr Ansgood’ and that the latter ‘has the best leaden figures ... very good pieces with fine mantel or drapery caste very loosely ... they are moderne’ (Winde/Bridgeman).

...........................


Treasury Papers. Vol.  CCXXXLX - 29th March 1722

 Petition of Ric hard Osgood, statuary to the  Lords of the Treasury

 Was employed by the Office of Works to model and cast in hard mettle, two large sea horses, and two large tritons, to spout the water in the great bason or fountain in Bushey Park, at Hampton Court, the bills for which were entered and passed for £1801.

The figures were set up and finished eight or nine months after the King's Accession to play the water against the King's coming to Hampton Court, but the bills remain unpaid to this day.

29th March 1722. To be paid £180" 1 page.

.........................


MGS

Literary References: Harris 1957-8, 193-7; Gunnis 1968, 284-5; Davis 1991 (1), 34, 42, 52

Archival References: ‘large Caesar’s head for the Guard-room, 1691’, TNA WORK E.351/1347 fol 9; Lincs RO Jarvis I/D/2/14; WCA; Poor Rate 1697, F1232; Highways Rate 1722 F5550; Poor Rate 1733-1737, C118-C127; GPC

Will: PROB 11/597/26-7


...............

Two Statues supplied by Osgood to Knole, Kent.

The Crouching Venus and the Borghese Gladiator

1697.

A bill for 'Statuary work' dated 6th September 1697, from the sculptor Richard Osgood, bills Charles Sackville, 6th Earl of Dorset, 'for the case for the Venus and pedestal that went to Knowell', as well as 'for the Gladiator as agreed for, for a Large stone plinth and Shield with my Lords Arms'.

 A lead statue was recorded in the Green Court in the 1706 inventory of Knole, as 'One Leaden Statue on a pedestall'. This could refer to either the 'Crouching Venus' (NT 130062) or the 'Borghese Gladiator' (NT 130066)

Two bronze casts were previously supplied by Hubert Le Sieur. The first in 1629/30 for Charles I now at Windsor Castle and and a second supplied to Wilton House in 1645 (now at Houghton, Norfolk).

A receipt dated 6 September 1697 from Richard Osgood (died c.1724) bills the Earl 'For the Gladiator as agreed for' and 'For a Large stone plinth and Shield wth my Lords Armes'.  'One Leaden Statue on a pedestall'. This could refer to either the Crouching Venus (NT 130062) or the Borghese Gladiator (NT 130066).

The 1765 inventory records two statues in the Green Court: 'two Statues in the Green-Court'.

This suggests to me that Osgood was using the original moulds made by/for Hubet Le Sieur.

.......................

Osgood in the Attingham Archives.

From the National Archive -This record is held by Shropshire Archives - Attingham Collection Reference:  112/1/2203

A Bill of Statuary Worke done for the Honble Mr. Hill. 22 August, 1712

For 6 Roman heads £6.0.0d.

 For bronzing them £3.0.0d.

 6 cartoores, 6s. each £1.16.0d.

 Total £10.16.0. Receipted Richard Osgood.

 Docketed in Hill's hand "Mr. Osgood for busts, 1712."


................................

Will of Richard Osgood,

National Archives Prob 11/597/17

 

The will of Richard Osgood of St Martin-in-the-Fields was proved in April 1724, and though there is no mention of the profession of the deceased in the document, it is likely that this is the sculptor. He left his ‘little house’ at Clargis Street in the ‘high road leading to Piccadilly’ to his daughter Elizabeth Osgood, and another property on Hyde Park Corner to his wife Anne, who also received houses in Knightsbridge, Chelmsford and Much Haddon. These properties continued in family possession until 1737.

...............................


to be continued...................













Wednesday, 26 February 2025

The van Spangens.

 


The van Spangens - a  family of Masons and Sculptors.

The family appears to have operated in London between 1677 and 1757

Sometime in the 1790's Nicholas van Spangen appears as a manufacturer of artificial Stone until about 1825.

.............

Synchronicity.

This essay resulted from two separate strands of research - 

The first into the apprenticeship of John Cheere with Henry Crofts - mason, d.1727.

and the second - a request to discover more information about the artificial stone manufacturer Felix Austin fl 1817 -72 who indented a life size composition stone cast of the Hound of the Alcibides dated 1826. 


................

Richard van Spangen I - fl. 1677. ( b.c 1652 - 1702)  He was described as of St Brides, London, Carver, aged about 25 when he married Martha Garland on 18 September 1677.

..................


The Will of Richard van Spangen d. c.1757. Mason and Haberdasher of Camberwell pub. 1757.

see National Arc - https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/D576366


...................


Richard van Spangen II. (d. c. 1757)

The Font in Dulwich College Chapel.

1728.

In 1728van Spangen subscribed to James Gibbs’s Book of Architecture.

Richard van Spangen made the font (designed by Gibbs) for Dulwich College in 1729 (Young’s History of Dulwich College, Vol. II, page 346). Dr. Gibson, then chaplain to the Archbishop of Canterbury, and subsequently Bishop of London, presented to the College the font which is still in the chapel, made by Mr. Van Spangen from a design of Mr. Gibbs, architect, and bearing the reversible Greek motto, — (Wash away sin, not the visage only.)

This was commissioned by Mr Hume whose memorandum reads ‘Sept 1729 I agreed with Mr Van Spangen to make me a font to the dimensions and form of the draught made by Mr Gibbs architect. The Bason and pedestal to be of the best white veined marble. The plinth of black marble vein’d with gold, and the step of Portland stone. The whole to be perforated with a brass stop-cock to carry off the water into a cistern below, and to be set up in Dulwich College Chapel’ (Young 1889, 2, 346).


......................

The Monument to Lord Trevor.

In the Dynevor Chapel, St Owens, Bromham Park, Bedfordshire.

1732.

Richard van Spangen.


He is almost certainly the ‘Mr Spangor’ who provided the monument for Lord Trevor at Bromham, commissioned by the 3rd Baron Trevor. It has an armorial shield with helm, crest and supporters, and a cushion of white marble supporting the baron’s coronet. The Rev Benjamin Rogers noted in his diary ‘Some of the marble cost Mr. Spangor the Statuary in the block in Italy 18s. per foot, which stood him in 26s. per foot when brought to London, this was black with yellow veins’ (Harvey 1872-8, 68). It was completed on 25 October 1732.

Baron Trevor like his father he was a Fellow of the Royal Society. He was MP, as a whig, for Woodstock [Oxfordshire] from 1746 to 1753. He married Elizabeth, daughter of Sir Richard Steele, on 30th May 1732. The 3rd Baron died on 17th September 1764 at Bath, Somerset, aged 69 and was buried at Bromham where his monument may be seen in the north aisle.

Images below from -

https://seearoundbritain.com/venues/st-owens-church-bromham-open-on-request-free/pictures















.........................


Richard van Spangen and the Widdrington Monument.

in Nunnington Church. North Riding Yorkshire.

Designed by and inscribed James Gibbs.

1743.

Notebook with the Royal Society of Antiquaries -The contents list indicates that these were communicated by Mr Van Spangen, mason of Camberwell - Nunnington North Riding, Yorkshire, to William, Lord Widdrington (d. 1743); inscription at Milton, near Peterborough, to Sir William Fitzwilliam, kt (d.1599); and inscription at Cuckfield, Sussex, to Charles Sergison (d.1732).


https://collections.sal.org.uk/sal.10.10.086





..........

The Monument to Arthur Winsley in St James Church, Colchester, Essex.

Richard van Spangen.

1726/7.

Richard van Spangen III's largest known commission is the monument to Alderman Arthur Winsley , a full-length reclining portrait statue of a Colchester cloth merchant and philanthropist, seen turning thoughtfully away from a book imploring the viewer to ‘Go and do likewise’ (the iconography was suggested by Winsley himself in his will).


David Beattie’s booklet of 2003 not only connects him with the Winsley monument, based on the faculty, contract and receipt to be found in the Essex Record Office, it also considerably expands on the little that is known about Van Spangen’s life and career, including the important fact that he was apprenticed to Samuel Fulkes ( d.1714), one of the leading masons of the time: amongst other appointments Fulkes was ‘overseer of the masons’ for the building of St Paul’s Cathedral in London.



Image of the Winsley Monument at Colchester below from.

https://www.esah1852.org.uk/library/files/newsletter-199-summer-2022-2392615216.pdf



.................

Source: Prerogative Court of Canterbury, Probate 17 Apr 1741.

Thomas Bates of East Greenwich, gardener, will dated 10 Aug 1738. 'good for nothing' sister Elizabeth Rogers wife Alice, executrix   - witnesses Richard Fenn - Elizabeth Phillips

Codicil dated 19 Mar 1740   - witnesses Mary Evans - Rich'd Van Spangen.

...........................

Nicholas van Spangen.

Described as an Altona (Hamburg) merchant in 1790's.


Messrs van Spangen & Co.


Extract from History and Survey of London pub. 1806.






...........................


Nicholas van Spangen.fl. 1790's - 1828.

The Kentish Weekly Post or Canterbury Journal -  in 1801 and Friday 08 January 1802 notes Nicholas van Spangen, Merchants at Wells St, Goodman's Fields, East London.

The London Gazette in 1804 mentions his Bankruptcy of 29 Nov. 1799 and states he is late of Wells Street.




The Later van Spangen and Powell.

Van Spangen and Powell – Felix Austin (fl. 1820s-1850s) acquired Van Spangen and Powell, manufacturers of artificial stone about 1828 and also acquired his moulds. Austin was at New Road, Regent’s Park, the business later became  Austin and Seeley. The firm, which specialised in garden ornaments, was still in existence in 1872.



...........................

Ars Quatuor Coronatorum: Being the Transactions of the Lodge ..., Volume 23.








Friday, 21 February 2025

A Group of Lead Statues sold at at Christie's in 2003.


Christie's 26 November 2003.

https://www.christies.com/lot/lot-4200436

The core of this private collection are the eighteenth century pieces (lot numbers 426-429, 431-432), the provenance to these pieces is almost certainly as follows: From the early 18th century with John Shepherd and his heirs at Campsea Ashe High House, Suffolk. (see engraving above) From about 1880 with the Earls of Guildford, Glemham Hall, Suffolk, subsequently with Lady North at Glemham Hall. From about 1914 with the Cobbold family at Glemham Hall. Later with Philip Cobbold at Tattingstone Place, Suffolk, (Thomas White architect, built 1726-40). From 1947 with the Budd family at Tattingstone Place and from 1966 with the present owner at the same. Campsea Ashe (see Country Life volume XVIII, p.54) is some five miles from Glemham Hall (see Country Life volume XXVII, p.18), Tattingstone Place is to the south of Ipswich.


Lot 426 - attributed to van Nost?

Flora.

Height 130.8cm.








..............


Lot 427 - Venus.

attributed to John Cheere.

108cms.







......................

Lot 428, Bacchus.

82.5 cm.














Saturday, 15 February 2025

A Rysbrack Self Portrait Terracotta Bust.

 


A Rysbrack Self Portrait Terracotta Bust.

and a Marble Bust erroneously suggested as a Marble Self Portrait.


One of the problems with writing a blog like is is the number of distractions or rabbit holes to disappear into. I have been meaning to post this for a long time.


Whilst on a mission to record the busts at the University of Oxford a visit to the Ashmolean Museum on the 14th August 2019 with my camera brought me to an unidentified marble bust suggested and labelled as a possible self portrait of Michael Rysbrack.


Previously in 2014 whilst visiting Holland on another project I attended the exhibition of terracottas in the Collection of Charles Van Herck at the Bonnefantenmuseum, Maastricht. Netherlands where there was the terracotta self portrait.


This exhibition contained a small selection of his collection, which his relatives placed in the custody of the King Boudewijn Foundation in Brussels, is usually on display in the Museum of Fine Arts in Antwerp.


Until quite recently a drawing attributed to Jonathan Richardson the elder acquired, 1942, by the Victoria and Albert Museum, the oil by Vanderbank was the only portrait known until two versions of a type by Soldi appeared in the salerooms in 1970 (see below). 

Both approximately 45 x 34 ½ in., virtually identical and signed and dated 1753, they show the sculptor at work on the model of his celebrated statue of Hercules [2] at Stourhead.

The first, provenance unknown, was lot 94 at Christie's, 10 April 1970; the other was at Sotheby's, 24 June 1970, lot 109, as from the C. Fairfax Murray collection.

The self-portrait terracotta bust was executed for the sitter's patron Dr Cox Macro and delivered to his home in Suffolk, 1735.

.....................


The Portraits of Michael Rysbrack.

Portrait of Rysbrack.

Vanderbank (1694 - 1739).

c. 1728.

National Portrait Gallery.

Provenance -

Bought through Leggatt's, Peel Heirlooms sale, Robinson, Fisher and Harding, 6 December 1917, lot 89; acquired, 1839, by Sir Robert Peel 'at Sir Wm Beechey's sale, Portrait of Rysbrack by Vanderbank for two Pounds!!'. [1]

 1) Sir Robert Peel, Day Book, July 1839 (Surrey Record Office); also Mrs Jameson, Private Galleries of Art, 1844, p 377 (124).


NPG 1802 is obviosly to be related to the engraving of 1734 by Faber junior with the same head lettered J. Vanderbank pinx. 1728. 

In the latter the sitter points with his left hand to a classical head different from the one in the oil and reminiscent of that shown in 'A Conversation of Virtuosis' by Gawen Hamilton.


 



https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portraitExtended/mw05558/John-Michael-Rysbrack?





....................


Rysbrack by Vanderbank.

The Faber Mezzotint of 1734.

Paper size  (35.2 × 25.3 cm), Image: (31.8 × 25.3 cm).

Lettered in black ink, lower left: "J. Vanderbank pinxt. 1728"; lower center: "Michael Rysbrack, SCULPTOR. | Antuerpiæ Natus."; lower right: "J: Faber fecit 1734 | Sold by J Faber at ye Golden head ye South side of Bloomsbury Square"



........................


The Portrait at the Victoria and Albert Museum suggested as Rysbrack by Richardson the Elder.


Captain HB Murray bought the picture for 16 guineas at a sale at Christie's on 5th December 1908, where it was lot 107. The name of the previous owner is not given in the sale catalogue.


https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O122248/john-michael-rysbrack-sculptor-oil-painting-richardson-jonathan-the/?carousel-image=2007BP0894

I remain to be convinced of either attribution.




 


.............................


Rysbrack by Richardson the Elder.

Victoria and Albert Museum.

Inscribed - Michael Rysbrac, [sic.] statuary, drawn by old Mr. Richardson - J. Cranch.

Purchased 2 February 1942 from Mr. Herbert Bier, 2 Strathearn Place, London W2 (RPs: 42 / 110).

https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O225296/john-michael-rysbrack-portrait-drawing-richardson-jonathan-the/








...........................


(Is this?) Michael Rysbrack.

 From the picture archive of London dealer Philip Mould.

 They suggest - circa 1735 by John Vanderbank.

  90.2 x 70.49 cm

 Provenance: Sir George Leon, Bt., Christie's, Lord Major's Appeal fund for the Duke of Gloucester's Red Cross and St. John's Fund 12 July 1940, Lot 859 (45 gns. to Stuart Wortley);

 The Hon. Clare Stuart Wortley; Christie's, 30 October, 1942, Lot 92.

https://historicalportraits.com/artists/263-john-vanderbank/works/1628-john-vanderbank-portrait-of-michael-rysbrack-the-sculptor-c.-1735/

Given that the website states that he was responsible for the Vauxhall Statue of Handel (Roubiliac now in the V and A ) it is probably fair to question the attribution.




................................

A Conversation of Virtuosi ...... at the Kings Arms.

Painted in 1734–1735 to 'promote his interest' 

(the completed picture was raffled, each sitter paying four guineas).

 by Gawen Hamilton (1697 - 1737).

 NPG.

The figure of Rysbrack looks rather clumsily added to me - it has possibly been inserted at a later date.


The images provided here are not in high enough resolution to make any real comparisons but comparison with the so called Richardson portrait at the V and A (above ) might suggest that they are related.


Is the Richardson V and A portrait a study by Gawen Hamilton for the group portrait below.


https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait/mw00352/A-Conversation-of-Virtuosisat-the-Kings-Arms







This description lifted from the NPG website -

https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/explore/by-publication/kerslake/early-georgian-portraits-catalogue-a-conversation-of-virtuosis-.-.-.-at-the-kings-armes.-a-club-of-artists

Early Georgian Portraits Catalogue: ‘A Conversation of Virtuosis . . . at the Kings Armes.' (A Club of Artists)

1384 By Gawen Hamilton, 1735.

Oil on canvas, 34 ½ x 43 7/8 in. (877 x 1115 mm); from left to right, the names inscribed with black: in brown, holding book with both hands, Vertue G; in grey, leaning on back of chair, Hyssing; in brown, seated, holding a landscape drawing, Dahl; seated behind the table in blue, Thomas Aht (?); [1] looking at the latter, holding a rolled paper, wearing slate grey suit, Gibbs mr (?); gesturing left, in brown, J. Gouppy; seated, near side of table, in grey suit with silver lace frogging, Robinson; leaning right, in light blue, Bridgeman / Gar; in pale brown, holding scroll, looking back towards him, Barren (?); [2] in pale brown coat, pale green waistcoat with gold lace, resting his left hand on the shoulder of the next, Woolet (originally Wooton); [3] in dark grey, holding dividers, his left hand on an antique female bust, Rysbrac St.; behind the bust, holding brush and palette, Hamilton (without inscription); holding dividers, in mid-brown coat, Kent; large room; rear wall divided by pilasters, male and female statues in niches; brown carpet with blue edging; a dog lying between the feet of Dahl and Robinson; far left, table with two large books, a third book on the floor, leaning against it; top right, a curtain drawn back.

 

Formerly catalogued as ‘A Club of Artists', Vertue's description of NPG 1384 is here restored. He must have first seen the picture in its unfinished state with only ten figures, mentioning it in an account of Hamilton's work towards the end of 1734: 'But the piece of a Conversation of Virtuosis that usually meet at the Kings Armes. New bond Street a noted tavern. is truly a Master piece as far as is done. truly shews him a Master of Art. the persons there represented. are ten' [4] Then follows the list of sitters, sketched with a key: ‘Mr. Dahl, Mr. Wm Thomas. Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Hysing Mr. Bridgman. Gardner. Mr. Baron Engraver. Mr. Wooton. Mr. Rysbrake statuary. Mr Robinson a Gent. & Mr. Kent Vertue. Jos Goupy. and Gn Hamilton pictor.' [5] The names of Vertue, Goupy and Hamilton are the last three in the list, while in the key, Goupy is numbered11,Vertue 12, and Hamilton is not indicated. Kent is behind the bust near Hamilton's present position. Consequently, Hamilton may have been added later, and indeed, the paint is thin here.



Mr Thomas? see the anonymous bust by Rysbrack below.

 

There is little problem concerning the identity of the sitters except for Thomas who is rather obscure. Mrs Finberg suggests that he may be the 'steward to the Earl of Oxford' mentioned by Vertue in 1732 as having his head modelled by Rysbrack. [6] He was co-arbitrator with Gibbs in 1723 for the Oxford chapel, Marylebone Road. Two successive William Thomases, treated as one by Redgrave, are distinguished by Colvin, and judging by age, he must be the earlier one. [7] Robinson is surely correctly identified by the provenance and information in Brayley to which Mrs Finberg drew attention. The father of the famous Mrs Montagu and an accomplished artist, his great nephew states he 'excelled most of the professional artists of his day in landscape'. [8]

 

The sitters are:

 Bernard Baron (1696-1762), the French engraver, who settled in England c.1722;

 Charles Bridgman (d.1738), landscape architect, designer of the gardens at Stowe;

 Michael Dahl (1656-1743);

 James Gibbs (1682-1754) (q.v., NPG 504);

 Joseph Goupy (died before 1782) (see Taylor, NPG 1920);

 Gawen Hamilton (1698-1737) whose conversation style not infrequently has been confused with Hogarth's;

 Hans Hysing (1678-1752/3) (seeEgmont, NPG 1956);

 William Kent (1684-1748) (q.v., NPG 1557);

 Mathew Robin­son (c.1694-1778);

 John Michael Rysbrack (1693?-1770) (q.v., NPG 1802);

 William Thomas (fl.1722-37);

 George Vertue (1683-1756) (q.v., NPG 576); and

 John Wootton (c.1686-1765), the landscape painter

 

The painting appears to have been commissioned under rather unusual circumstances. Vertue relates a proposition to promote 'the Interest of Mr. Hamilton' by which each sitter paid four guineas and the completed picture was raffled, the winner being Goupy, who later sold it to the Prince of Wales. [9] This has not been verified, however. Horace Walpole, who confused Joseph with his uncle Louis (d.1747), apparently knew a Goupy sale in March 1765 which included ‘a piece in oil by Hamilton with portraits of several artists', [10] where, Mrs Finberg suggests very plausibly, it could have been bought by Robinson. [11] This sale is not otherwise recorded; a posthumous Joseph Goupy sale, Langford and Son, 3 April 1770, lot 1826, does not contain anything identifiable as NPG 1384.

 

The question of whether the painting represents a particular club of artists is too involved for lengthy discussion here. In favour is the suggestion of regular meetings—'usually meets' in Vertue's description—but Mrs Webb's view that the Society of Virtuosi of St Luke is depicted should be approached with caution. [12] The venue of St Luke's is not known so late. 

While the group includes seven persons who had been stewards of St Luke's by this date, Bridgman, Dahl, Gibbs, Goupy, Rysbrack and Vertue, Kent was not elected until 1743. Goupy deserted in 1727 when his turn came to be steward, whose costly duty it was to provide hospitality on the annual feast day. It seems unlikely that he would have been included. 

Seven of the artists, Baron, Gibbs, Hamilton, Hysing, Rysbrack, Vertue and Wootton, were members of the less exalted and less restrained Rose and Crown Club, possibly by this date, though this is not altogether certain. But this usually met at the Rose and Crown in Covent Garden, not at the Kings Arms in New Bond Street, and Vertue provides a pretty full account of its membership, which does not include the other five sitters. [13]

 

Vertue, it will be noted, does not himself use the term 'club', but simply refers to the picture as 'A Conversation of Virtuosis'. Despite the title of the club The Virtuosi or St Luke's Club found in his manuscript, [14] it seems safer for the present to regard 'Virtuosis', which occurs elsewhere in his notes, [15] as a near synonym for cognoscenti and artists. NPG 1384, then, may be considered a painting in which members of both clubs happen to occur, rather than as either club in session.

 

It has been suggested that the group of fifteen figures in the Ashmolean Museum once attributed to Hogarth may be by Hamilton and may even be connected with NPG 1384, but it is not well preserved, and fuller investigation would require confrontation of the two pictures. The Ashmolean group was described by J.B. Nichols in 1833 as a 'Portraits of a Society of Artists, that existed about 1730' [16] It is stated in 1827 to have born an inscription which included 'Hamilton, Dahl, Laroon, Gibbon or Gibson, Rysbrach, Vanderbank, Bridgman and Kent'. [17] Both references are nearly a century later. While the style is reminiscent of NPG 1384, the composition is not sufficiently connected with it. Five of those named were members of the Rose and Crown club: Gibson, Hamilton, Laroon, Rysbrack and Vanderbank, but the others are not known to have belonged to it.

Notes - 

1. The last word is very rubbed; only the A is clear.

2. The last letter of the inscription has been altered to a 't'.

3. The last letter of the inscription has been altered.

4. Vertue, III, p.71.

5. Ibid.

6. Finberg, p.52, note 2; Vertue, III, p.57. The bust is not known now.

7. Colvin, pp.608-09.

8. Climenson, p.3.

9. Vertue, III, pp.71-72.

10. Anecdotes, p.752.

11. Finberg, p.54.

12. Webb, pp 56-62.

13. VI, pp.32-35; for information concerning the clubs, see Whitley, I, pp.7, 69, 74-77; II, pp.241-44.

14. BM Add. MS 39167, cited by Whitley.

15. Vertue, VI, pp.165-67: 'A List of Virtuosi in Italy'.

16. J.B. Nichols, p. 376; engraved by R. Cooper, O'D V, p.54; the attribution to Hogarth is no longer tenable.

17. Literary Gazette, 1827, cited by Whitley, I, p.70.

18. Beauties, VIII, p.1127, note.

 

Condition: curtain appears faded; background worn near statues; restorations to the inscriptions (as indicated); Kent now very faint; paint between Hamilton and Kent thin; pin hole damages in corners; losses to varnish along outer edges.

 

Collections: purchased, 1904, from Miss Elizabeth Montagu, great granddaughter of Mathew Robinson; in Brayley's description, 1808, of the Robinson house, Mount Morris, Horton, Kent, in which the family is said to be 'still in possession of the picture'; [18] this suggests that it may originally have belonged to Robinson, although the identity of its first owner is uncertain (see above).

 

Literature: J.B. Nichols, Anecdotes of William Hogarth.1833; Elizabeth Montagu . . . Correspondence from 1720 to 1761,ed. E.J. Climenson, 1906; H.F.Finberg, 'Gawen Hamilton', The Walpole Society.VI, 1917-18; W.T. Whitley, Artists and Their Friends in England 1700-99,1928.

.................................


A Conversation of Virtuosi at The Kings Arms.

Attributed to Gawen Hamilton - oil on canvas; Size 61 x 72 cm.

Ashmolean Museum.


 

 

This unfinished work may be related to Gawen Hamilton's celebrated Assembly of Virtuosi of 1735 (National Portrait Gallery) see above.

 

The Assembly was etched by Richard Sawyer and published by W.B. Tiffin, on 1 May 1829.

The etching identifies eight of the fifteen sitters, including the painters Dahl, Laroon, Hamilton himself and Vanderbank; the architect William Kent; the sculptor Rysbrack; the gardener, Charles Bridgeman, and an unknown 'Gibbons'. Although the etching calls the group simply 'A Society of Artists', it has been suggested that they may be 'Rosacoronians', members of the Rose and Crown Club. 

The names from the print have been copied out at the top left corner of the painting. The list may have been invented.




With production detail, "Etched by Richd Sawyer / London Published May 1. 1829, by W. B. Tiffin, 3 Hay Market / Proof".

https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/P_1851-0308-1


.........................


John Michael Rysbrack Modelling His Terra-Cotta Statue of Hercules.

 Andrea Soldi.

1753.

Yale Centre for British Art.

The marble, which Horace Walpole considered Rysbrack’s “chef d’oeuvre,” was commissioned by Henry Hoare of Stourhead in Wiltshire and was completed in 1756. 

A terracotta bust of Hercules by Rysbrack is at YCBA .

The terracotta model represented in the painting was bequeathed to Hoare by Rysbrack in 1770, and it remains at Stourhead.


https://collections.britishart.yale.edu/catalog/tms:308












..............

The Rysbrack Terracotta Hercules.

in the Library at Stourhead.



The Statue of Hercules in the Pantheon at Stourhead.




....................................


Another unrelated terracotta figure of Hercules.

Saltram.

Photographed by the author.

Normally I would say leave the surface alone on an object, but in this case I recommend that it be very gently cleaned and the remains of the paint removed. 

It is difficult to determine the manufacturer but given that there are a couple of other Coade pieces at Saltram it is tempting to suggest that this one of Mrs Coade's productions.

Certainly the quality of the hand finishing is exquisite particularly the modelling of  the hair and beard.







.....................

The Self Portrait Bust.

George Vertue mentions in 1732 a self-portrait bust and in 1752 a portrait by I. Whood finished by Vanhaecken, 'another picture of Mr Michael Rysbrack. sculptor drawn & painted by Mr. Isaac Whood who lately dyd some years before he began that portrait of Mr Rysbrack which was thought more like than that of Vanderbank - as it truely is. therefore it is lately finisht the posture hands &c. by Mr. Van achen ...'.








































............................


The Rysbrack Marble Bust of an Anonymous Man.

Ashmolean Museum.

Photographed by the Author in 2019.

Described as possibly a self portrait of 1730.

Is this the Mr Thomas included in the painting of  A Conversation of Virtuosi ...... at the Kings Arms.


The bust from a Private Collection - it was on loan to the Ashmolean 2019.


Making comparisons with the terracotta above it is hard to reconcile that the two busts represent the same person - my guess is that the marble is an unrecognised and so far remaining anonymous bust by Rysbrack. 

The individual portraits in the Conversation of Virtuosi are identifiable as 


George Vertue, antiquary and engraver, 1683-1756, who described the picture in his Notebooks.

He made a sketch with key to the sitters in his notebook in 1734. Vertue was Secretary of the Rose and crown group.

Hans Hysing, portrait painter, 1678-1753. Swedish portrait painter settled in London by 1700

Michael Dahl (seated), portrait painter, 1659-1743. another Swede settled in London by `689

William Thomas, antiquary, circa 1677-1764. Steward to the Earl of Oxford.

James Gibbs, architect, 1682-1754. Architect chief patron was the earl of Oxford.

Joseph Goupy, watercolour painter, 1689-1769, who won the picture when raffled in 1735.

Matthew Robinson (seated), amateur artist, circa 1694-1778, whose family later owned the picture.

Charles Bridgeman, landscape gardener, died 1738.

Bernard Baron, engraver, 1696-1762. engraved a portrait of Gibbs after a relief by Rysbrack

John Wootton, landscape painter, circa 1682-1765. A close acquaintance of Rysbrack. He witness the agreement between Henry Hoare and Rysbrack for the Stourhead Hercules.

John Michael Rysbrack, sculptor, 1694-1770.

Gawen Hamilton, painter of the picture, circa 1697-1737.

William Kent, architect, 1685-1748.

Rysbrack is known to have made busts of six of the sitters in this portrait -

....................

The Rysbrack Busts of 6 of the sitters in the Conversation of Virtuosi.

Gibbs, Kent, Dahl, Thomas, Goupy and Wooton - only the two of Gibbs are known ( the Radcliffe Camera version and the V and A) - the bust here does not resemble any portraits of Kent (two busts reported Vertue - 

The portrait is dated 1734 - Dahl would have been in his seventies which rules out him, as a sitter. Thomas would have been 57. Goupy would have been aged about 54- his bust is untraced. and Wooton would have been aged about 70.


If the bust was made in about 1730/40 Thomas is the most likely candidate for the sitter if it represents a member of this group is Mr Thomas.


More Missing Rysbrack Busts.

Culled from Biographical Dictionary pub. Yale 2009. 

Samuel Butler pre 1732 (Vertue).

Ben Johnson (Vertue).

Sir Thomas and Lady Hewitt untraced Vertue.

Thomas Ripley - Architect - Rysbrack Sale of 1765, lot 18.

Matthew Tindall, from a death mask (Biographica Britannica 1763).

Captain Aubin (Vertue) pre 1732.

Colonel James Pelham (Vertue) pre 1732.

Lord Macclesfield (Vertue) pre 1732.

Mr and Mrs Booth (Vertue) pre 1732.

Mr Halsey

Mr Holland 'Herald Painter'

Sir Thomas and Lady Hewett (Vertue) pre 1732.

Mr Mason

MR Milner

Mr Morett

Mrs Davenport 

Mrs Nash.

Sarah Duchess of Marlborough.

Queen Caroline - almost certainly a version at Queens College Oxford.


















































The Terracota Bust of perhaps Peter Tillemans.

Michael Rysbrack.

Inscribed "Mcl/ Rysbrack f[ecit] 1727".


Formerly with Dr Cox Macro.

Yale Centre for British Art.



For more info see -





















































Francis Hayman would have seen a terracotta self-portrait by Rysbrack and a pendant bust of Peter Tillemans in the collection of Dr. Cox Macro at Little Haugh Hall, Norton, Suffolk, when he was engaged to paint the ceiling above the staircase there in the late summer of 1743.

Tillemans was a painter, originally from Antwerp (like Rysbrack), from whom Macro had commissioned at least twenty paintings and sixteen drawings over a period of twenty years; they became close friends and Tillemans died in Macro's house on 19 November 1734.

His death seems to have prompted Dr. Macro to take delivery of the terracotta bust of the painter which Rysbrack had modelled in 1727 — it is signed and dated on the back Mcl Rysbrack: 1727.

He also to commission from Rysbrack a self-portrait.

George Vertue remarked of Peter Tillemans that 'the Model of his face by Rysbrack is very much like him. nothing more like unless his two daughters that he has left.

Rysbrack wrote to Macro on 4 March 1735 indicating that the bust of 'our Old Frind. W Thillemans' and its pedestal were ready to be sent, but that he had not yet started on his self-portrait, which Dr. Macro had commissioned in an earlier letter of 14 December 1734 (not extant, but referred to by Rysbrack).